From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:50:50 -0600 Message-ID: <20070720175050.GI14791@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070720164043.523003359@mail.of.borg> <20070720164324.097994947@mail.of.borg> <20070720173132.GB19424@linux-mips.org> <20070720173359.GA22423@infradead.org> <46A0F453.60005@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:43310 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbXGTRuw (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:50:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A0F453.60005@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ralf Baechle , Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:43:47PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello Christoph: > > >>>+#include > > >>These days that should probably be . > > >Not at all, linux/irq.h is something entirely different. > > Actually, Not for enable/disable_irq. For request_irq, yes. This is something that should be fixed. -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."