From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:05:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20070725130536.GA12334@elte.hu> References: <469600F7.3060603@free.fr> <20070723095357.GA886@elte.hu> <46A4B7C2.1070304@free.fr> <20070723160442.GA7995@elte.hu> <46A5B8E3.4060004@free.fr> <46A74A58.1070704@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: John Sigler Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A74A58.1070704@free.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: oprofile-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: oprofile-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org * John Sigler wrote: > >With a pair of the following in the middle: > > > >softirq--4 0.... 670us : call_rcu (rt_run_flush) > >softirq--4 0D..1 670us : __rcu_advance_callbacks (call_rcu) > Any idea what went wrong in the above function trace? Why is the > kernel spinning in circles that way? does your test-app have higher priority than softirq--4 ? Ingo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/