From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: [BUG] Strange 1-second pauses during Resume-from-RAM Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:35:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20071130183510.GA1570@lazybastard.org> References: <4739E347.30406@rtr.ca> <473C7495.40805@rtr.ca> <20071115181418.GA6603@ucw.cz> <473C825E.3030307@rtr.ca> <20071115193424.GA31691@elte.hu> <20071115193612.GA751@elte.hu> <20071130125628.GA30773@lazybastard.org> <20071130133546.GB29679@elte.hu> <20071130134312.GA32273@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071130134312.GA32273@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: len.brown@intel.com, J?rn Engel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Lord , Mark Lord , Thomas Gleixner , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 November 2007 14:43:12 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >=20 > http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/latency-tracing-v2.6= .24-rc3.combo.patch >=20 > does it work any better? It compiles. It boots with a 512M RAM (384M was too little with all the other debug options on). But it seems to lock up when running trace-cmd. On a rerun it locks up again, but with different output. Rerun was captured: http://logfs.org/~joern/trace1.jpg I should do a couple of runs, but my girlfriend claims realtime priority for the evening. J=C3=B6rn --=20 Chance favors only the prepared mind. -- Louis Pasteur