From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.24-rc4] spi core stops updating dev->power.power_state Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:52:21 -0800 Message-ID: <200712041252.21889.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200712041159.43712.david-b@pacbell.net> <20071204122401.d06d6699.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071204122401.d06d6699.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:59:42 -0800 > David Brownell wrote: > > > Subject: [patch 2.6.24-rc4] spi core stops updating dev->power.power_state > > Methinks this should have been "spi core: stop updating > dev->power.power_state"? Either one seems correct to me ... The Chicago Manual of Style doesn't seem to cover such issues. ;) > > Don't update dev->power.power_state any more in the SPI core. The > > only reason to update this scheduled-to-be-removed field was to make > > the already-removed /sys/devices/.../power/state files work better. > > > > For 2.6.25, yes? Absolutely. Ditto for the other similar patches you're about to see. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4