From: Mike Frysinger Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:43:39 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Request to mailing list U-Boot-Users rejected In-Reply-To: <200712111741.57017.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20071211221307.CCFF7246C2@gemini.denx.de> <200712111741.57017.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <200712111743.40701.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <200712112009.06587.sr@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > > Message body is too big: 40979 bytes with a limit of 40 KB > > > > ... > > > > > 100k limit, please. > > > > And what happens whith the next posting with a size of 100k + N bytes? > > with that logic, why allow 40k. take it down to 10k. or 1k. > > posting valid patches that exceed 40k is not uncommon. patches exceeding > 100k is much less uncommon. actually, if you're NAK-ing this by yourself, then i dont see why you'ed NAK a valid patch in the first place. someone posts a log file or configuration file or something that exceeds the limit makes sense. people developing source code when patches are supposed to be sent to the list does not. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20071211/6547d9f5/attachment.pgp