From: Paul Moore To: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/26] Add a secctx_to_secid() LSM hook to go along with the existing Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:19:40 -0500 Cc: David Howells , sds@tycho.nsa.gov, casey@schaufler-ca.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, npiggin@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org References: <20080115234652.22183.24850.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <200801160841.46633.paul.moore@hp.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200801161719.41264.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Wednesday 16 January 2008 5:13:53 pm James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 8:05:27 pm James Morris wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, David Howells wrote: > > > > secid_to_secctx() LSM hook. This patch also includes the SELinux > > > > implementation for this hook. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley > > > > > > This is useful in its own right, and I would like to push it upstream > > > for 2.6.24 unless there are any objections. > > > > Isn't it a bit late in 2.6.24 to add new functionality, especially when > > there isn't an in-tree user for it in 2.6.24? > > Actually, I meant to go into 2.6.24 after the merge window opens. I'm assuming you meant 2.6.25 in the sentence above? -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.