Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2193 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702AbYAXTCD (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:02:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:53:21 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Jussi Kivilinna Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] RFC: Driver for Wireless RNDIS USB devices. Message-ID: <20080124185321.GB3200@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080124_190312_222237_247E24EC) References: <20080120001342.25718.83669.stgit@fate.lan> <1201094475.7733.1.camel@localhost> <20080123145243.GA3129@tuxdriver.com> <1201110286.8696.10.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1201110286.8696.10.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:44:46PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 09:52 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > I would like to have this driver soon, and FWIW I just put it in the > > Fedora Rawhide kernel last night. > > > > However, I find that it does not seem to associate with WEP networks > > on my USR5421. I haven't had a chance to try it on open or WPA > > networks, nor have I had a chance to debug it. It does scan and see > > the networks. > > > > Have you tested the driver as posted? What device(s) are you using? > > Have you used it on encrypted networks? > > I guess I should start testing more if I'm going to be maintainer, > you're right WEP doesn't work. Unencrypted and WPA/WPA2 networks do work > for me but not WEP. Ad-Hoc and hidden WPA networks do not work either. I > have Buffalo WLI-U2-KG125S which should have same hardware/firmware as > USR5421. Overall this looks fine to me for initial merge. I have a couple of comments: -- I'm not too excited about the "Ndis_802_*" naming scheme for data structures, although I know you copied it from elsewhere. I'd like to see it changed, but I don't consider that a merge blocker. -- I foresee this driver surviving a conversion to use the new cfg80211 configuraiton API. So the "rndis_wext" name may not be the best long-term choice. I might suggest something like "rndis_wlan". I don't see why we couldn't change that post-merge, although I would prefer to do that before the final 2.6.25 release. So, I intend to push this upstream for 2.6.25. Please consider making the changes cited above, especially the name change. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com