From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git usb reset problems Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:13:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20080129201328.GZ15220@kernel.dk> References: <20080129141108.GV15220@kernel.dk> <200801291531.39825.oliver@neukum.org> <20080129143109.GW15220@kernel.dk> <20080129183910.GI15220@kernel.dk> <20080129191024.GO14375@one-eyed-alien.net> <1201635195.3069.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080129193520.GQ15220@kernel.dk> <20080129194543.GR15220@kernel.dk> <479F856C.4090900@panasas.com> <479F880F.20709@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479F880F.20709-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: James Bottomley , Matthew Dharm , Oliver Neukum , Greg KH , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> > > Ok this is not in Linus tree is it? Hence I did not have that failure. > > > > Boaz > > > > > > actually James bidi tree has a fix for this in the scsi_data_buffer patch. > > what you sent is not enough there are other places. look at this patch I > sent to the list. > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg21938.html Hard to compare, since its on different bases. > Could we take the 2 SG patches and submit them through the scsi > bidi tree? It is much more natural to have them in one tree as one > patchset then try coordinate with git-merge. Actually if you look at it, > the biggest change is to SCSI. So I think it is more natural this way What 2 sg patches do you mean? -- Jens Axboe