Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Jj1jD-0006Uk-32 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:30:23 +0000 From: Arnd Bergmann To: joern@logfs.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:30:16 +0200 References: <20080401181308.512473173@logfs.org> <20080401181332.853833001@logfs.org> In-Reply-To: <20080401181332.853833001@logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804080230.17426.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 01 April 2008, joern@logfs.org wrote: > --- linux-2.6.24logfs/fs/Kconfig~logfs 2008-03-24 12:39:10.190939342 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.24logfs/fs/Kconfig 2008-04-01 19:48:18.517351063 +0200 > @@ -1385,6 +1385,23 @@ config JFFS2_CMODE_FAVOURLZO > > endchoice > > +config LOGFS > + bool "Log Filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL)" Is it really still the "Log Filesystem"? By now, I had the impression that "logfs" is a name by itself, so it should be called the "Logfs file system", and "config LOGFS_FS" respectively, like JFFS2_FS, REISERFS_FS, AUTOFS_FS, UDF_FS etc. > --- /dev/null 2008-03-30 12:15:48.586669308 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.24logfs/fs/logfs/Makefile 2008-04-01 19:48:07.170961891 +0200 > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +obj-$(CONFIG_LOGFS) += logfs.o > + > +logfs-y += compr.o > +logfs-y += dir.o > +logfs-y += file.o > +logfs-y += gc.o > +logfs-y += inode.o > +logfs-y += journal.o > +logfs-y += memtree.o > +logfs-y += readwrite.o > +logfs-y += segment.o > +logfs-y += super.o > +logfs-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) += dev_bdev.o > +logfs-$(CONFIG_MTD) += dev_mtd.o You shouldn't add the Makefile and Kconfig before adding the actual files, or you could cause git-bisect problems. Arnd <><