From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <200804081542.00333.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20080401181308.512473173@logfs.org> <200804080230.17426.arnd@arndb.de> <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:58594 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751772AbYDHNmU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:42:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 08 April 2008, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > "Logfs file system" might make sense. =C2=A0LOGFS_FS is something I w= ould > rather avoid. =C2=A0For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repet= ition, > redundancy and superfluous information. >=20 How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html