From: Mike Frysinger Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:22:35 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver In-Reply-To: References: <20080328094435.GG4719@pengutronix.de> <20080413220155.37FEA248BF@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <200804132122.35906.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <20080328094435.GG4719@pengutronix.de> you wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Nick Droogh wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > Would this driver work with the LAN9218 chip as well? > > > > > > The chips in this family differ in that some of them have an > > > integrated phy and others not. Some have a 16bit bus interface and > > > others have a 32bit bus interface. > > > So yes, the driver should work with the 9218. > > > > Ben, it seems discussion stopped here without a decision or so. What's > > the state of this driver, then? > > I'm so sorry for non-responsiveness on this. I hate to make excuses > but I'm in the midst of moving my family across the country and um, > some things have slipped through the cracks. > > I've pulled Guennadi's latest submission for this driver into my local > copy, but haven't pushed it to the net repo yet. I have a few hours > available tomorrow where I'll finish this up and also look more > closely into JCPV's regression fix for the ne2000-related build > failure. i'm guessing the eeprom programmer i posted wont be part of this. should i just wait for everything to hit mainline and then post a patch to add it then ? -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080413/c677299a/attachment.pgp