From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] prepare kconfig inline optimization for all architectures Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:36:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20080427123642.GA28005@elte.hu> References: <20080427105100.GA14795@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080427113158.GY2252@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080427115603.GA23493@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080427115603.GA23493-QabhHTsIXMSnlFQ6Q1D1Y0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux arch , LKML , David Miller , Linus Torvalds * Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > My opinion on this is still: > > "OPTIMIZE" means "work around bugs in the kernel". > > So then let us name it: GCC_INLINING i object to that - please keep it named the way we came up with: OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y - because that's what it does. It goes along the same line as CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y. Perhaps rename it to CC_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y? Ingo