From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [rfc] [patch] clean up to ehci-omap (Was: Re: [patch] omap: usb: ehci: fix use of hcd->regs) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:35:48 -0700 Message-ID: <200809152335.48966.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20080912121024.GG759@gandalf.research.nokia.com> <200809152248.19959.david-b@pacbell.net> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02C4347F19@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.212]:37204 "HELO smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750990AbYIPGfv (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:35:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02C4347F19@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Gadiyar, Anand" Cc: "me@felipebalbi.com" , "Pandita, Vikram" , Tony Lindgren , "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" , Linux OMAP Mailing List On Monday 15 September 2008, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > > > ... yes, but also move all the pinmuxing to arch/arm/plat-omap/something > > > > Pin-muxing is done in the board file. Is there a problem with that? Sorry, I was too loose. I meant "pin setup", which is a superset of pin muxing. The functions in the second patch should be wrapped up in board-specific code.