From: Alasdair G Kergon Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:50:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add liblvm interactive test infrastructure to build. In-Reply-To: <20081207121730.GJ26097@agk.fab.redhat.com> References: <1228624391-904-1-git-send-email-dwysocha@redhat.com> <20081207121730.GJ26097@agk.fab.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20081207125021.GL26097@agk.fab.redhat.com> List-Id: To: lvm-devel@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 12:17:31PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > For the public library, I think 0 = success fits better - that's what we > have in our one other public library so far, liblvm2cmd Actually that's false - there's only one function returning a value and the interface fails to explain the meanings of its return values:-( But I think the library function here should be void anyway so the specific question doesn't arise yet:-) Alasdair -- agk at redhat.com