From: "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <mickey@vanille-media.de>
Organization: Vanille-Media
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:07:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <20081210234910.GA16050@excalibur.local>
	<200812110137.01104.mickey@vanille-media.de>
	<4940650B.1000802@dls.net>
In-Reply-To: <4940650B.1000802@dls.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200812110207.39687.mickey@vanille-media.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Ship dbus config and dbus service activation files
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Thursday 11 December 2008 01:55:39 schrieb Mike (mwester):
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > We can compile it completely without dbus support in a seperate recipe,
> > if that's what you want -- but given the increasing ubiquity of dbus,
> > that doesn't make much sense.
>
> Which raises a point -- there are still devices out there that don't
> want the X11 libraries (due to flash space limitations) -- perhaps it is
> _dbus_ that needs splitting into two separate recipes, one with X and
> one without?

I'd rather write a patch that tries to dlopen libX11. dbus needs libX11 only 
for setting one property on the root window.

-- 
:M: