From: Peter Moulder Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] relatime: Let relatime update atime at least once per day Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:29:53 +1100 Message-ID: <20090108122952.GA19743@mail.internode.on.net> References: <20081228152901.GB13565@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Piel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett , Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.146]:21268 "EHLO ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753328AbZAHM35 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:29:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081228152901.GB13565@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: What was the fate of Ingo's previous patch[*1] to implement this (which= , incidentally, also included updates to documentation and made the inter= val configurable as =C9ric Piel suggests) ? [*1]: http://lwn.net/Articles/244384/ Just a minor nit, but the patch description (not included in the patch = itself) "at least once a day" isn't particularly accurate given that the patch = enforces at least a day [minus a second or so] has elapsed since the last update= =2E The description in the above-referenced patch "only once a day" better capt= ures the situation, I think. pjrm. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html