From: John Levon Subject: Re: Design document of Kemari Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20090306173650.GC31979@movementarian.org> References: <49B073C5.6080702@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090306162849.GA31979@movementarian.org> <49B153D6.6080100@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090306170253.GB31979@movementarian.org> <49B15CAE.3050701@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49B15CAE.3050701@lab.ntt.co.jp> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Yoshiaki Tamura Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:26:06AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > Although the numbers are old, you can get an extended abstract and slides > which I used at Xen Summit from http://www.osrg.net/kemari Thanks, that has some more info. Seems like there's a good opportunity for someone to do some more detailed comparisons. > >If both projects are indeed headed for the tree, people are going to > >need some ideas of which to use... > > Well, I sent the following message when I open-sourced Kemari in November. > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-11/msg00682.html "We're also planning to merge with Remus from UBC to propose a better solution for Xen 3.4 together." That sounds very interesting. regards john