From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] I2C driver for MXC Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20090331110858.GA3044@pengutronix.de> References: <49C89E13.7040801@gmail.com> <20090324094215.GA3471@pengutronix.de> <49C8ABE5.40408@gmail.com> <20090325092625.GA3029@pengutronix.de> <49CA017D.20005@gmail.com> <20090325104357.GB3029@pengutronix.de> <20090330003012.GM19758@fluff.org.uk> <49D1F85C.8040703@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D1F85C.8040703-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Darius Augulis Cc: Ben Dooks , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-arm-kernel-xIg/pKzrS19vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Sascha Hauer List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Jean already requested Linus to pull I2C updates, how about imx-i2c? > Should we have this in rc1? I think he said he will do it today evening so we had time to get the i2c-imx problems sorted out. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknR+coACgkQD27XaX1/VRvFoQCgoE0ry3Tj02fPGlZvjvgPj8ea e0QAnj2r9Cd8WCeykBiz5ovCFRsy+957 =BX35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--