From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:07:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: hv: Transform PDEVICE_OBJECT and Message-Id: <20090728150716.GH3711@parisc-linux.org> List-Id: References: <200907281030.45317.npalix@diku.dk> <20090728144123.GB13883@suse.de> <200907281701.43509.npalix@diku.dk> In-Reply-To: <200907281701.43509.npalix@diku.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nicolas Palix Cc: Greg KH , hjanssen@microsoft.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote: > Ok. So, I guess the pattern for the other typedef is to strip the _OBJECT > suffix when present, and always add the prefix hv_, right ? The 'pattern' is to look at what the code is doing and choose a sensible name. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."