Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAE8947C for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLQBzBgXNPWv for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:26:44 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20090808172644.GA1045@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20090808132614.GA29656@fancy-poultry.org> <20090808152335.GA9818@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090808152335.GA9818@tansi.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] LUKS/dm-crypt vulnerable? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 08.08.2009, Arno Wagner wrote: > No, and they cannot do that on windows either. What they do is to > install this and then have you open the crypto container. Then > they can read. Thank you, that was what I wanted to know.