From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:30:09 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Network defrag
In-Reply-To: <4A832BCE.9060100@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1249645525.git.rubini@unipv.it>
	<200908121148.16431.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
	<4A83209E.4040809@gmail.com>
	<200908121653.23925.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
	<4A832BCE.9060100@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090812213009.EAF9D833DBD2@gemini.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Ben Warren,

In message <4A832BCE.9060100@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Sure, if you don't mind re-compiling.  I think it might be an 
> opt-outable message via puts_quiet()

It seems we start having a mess here, with features bound to other
features that have not even been agreeds about yet.

I have to admit that I am no friend of this puts_quiet() thingy. 
How much time do we really save on a normal system? Is this worth the
inconsistent behaviour and the (IMHO much uglier) code?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The face of war has never changed.  Surely it is more logical to heal
than to kill.
	-- Surak of Vulcan, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.5