From: Bob Copeland Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:59:09 -0400 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ath: advance ath.ko with one more helper In-Reply-To: <40f31dec0908121913y1dc39032p26556135f22c3f48@mail.gmail.com> References: <1250096221-11000-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <43e72e890908121027x5211c7cja3185861bc9c02f1@mail.gmail.com> <40f31dec0908121913y1dc39032p26556135f22c3f48@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090813025909.GB28871@hash.localnet> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:13:50AM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > You mean have a common reg.h for both ath5k and ath9k ? I meant the existing regulatory, not register, headers -- but if there is stuff to be shared in reg[ister].h we can do that too. > code is much cleaner than ath9k and it's a better place to start, i've > seen most hw > code on ath9k and i'm ready to move on if it's O.K. with you. I guess we should coordinate a bit. I don't have much in the way of unsent patches but perhaps we should pick a specific time to start moving stuff around so we don't all have a pile of rejects. Maybe after 2.6.32 merge window? (This particular patch series, though, is fine enough now I think.) -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com