From: =?utf-8?q?=C5=81ukasz_Ole=C5=9B?= <lukaszoles@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Remus: support for pvops dom0
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:10:33 +0200
Message-ID: <201004152110.33988.lukaszoles@gmail.com>
References: <patchbomb.1271281846@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca>
	<19399.7043.297474.894527@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <19399.7043.297474.894527@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thursday 15 April 2010 15:58:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brendan Cully writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Remus: support for pvop=
s=20
dom0"):
> > These two patches update the Remus network buffering code to work with
> > newer kernels, including the pvops tree.
>=20
> Excellent.
Great news. I will test them in the next week.

> I haven't looked at the code for the "remus" utility, but: How hard is
> it going to be to port it to libxl ?  I think remus is too exciting a
> feature to be left to rot with xend.

What is wrong with xend? I'm new here, and I just started to learn this=20
stuff... :)

Regards,
=C5=81ukasz Ole=C5=9B