Return-Path: From: elektra Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 13:40:07 +0200 References: <201005030828.08856.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <201005041021.30248.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <4BE0014E.8080204@aon.at> In-Reply-To: <4BE0014E.8080204@aon.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005041340.07717.onelektra@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] sysfs compat Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hello Franz - as a comment: Whenever I used drivers from a chip manufacturer so far I had a miserable experience. Basic features and most common applications usually work, but thats it. Drivers are usually buggy and unmaintained. Particularly ad-hoc mode support usually is theoretically there but practically broken. I know of no proprietary vendor driver that works properly. The fact that you are usually bound to a very old version of Linux is telling. I only use / promote chips with decent open-source support. OpenWrt is awesome. Cheers, Elektra