From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] d_ino considered harmful Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:42 +0200 Message-ID: <201006162110.43322.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20100616185913.GA15566@shell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Blunck , Jamie Lokier , David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Valerie Aurora Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100616185913.GA15566@shell> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 16 June 2010 20:59:13 Valerie Aurora wrote: > @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ static int fillonedir(void * __buf, const char * name, int namlen, loff_t offset > > if (buf->result) > return -EINVAL; > - d_ino = ino; > + /* Use of d_ino without st_dev is always buggy. */ > + d_ino = 0; > + > if (sizeof(d_ino) < sizeof(ino) && d_ino != ino) { > buf->result = -EOVERFLOW; > return -EOVERFLOW; Isn't this just the path taken by sys_oldreaddir? Glibc (at least on my box) translates all user calls to readdir into sys_getdents or sys_getdents64, so I think you'd also need to change filldir() and filldir64() for your testing. Arnd