From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:47:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support In-Reply-To: <1279517483-22751-8-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> References: <1279517483-22751-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-2-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-3-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-4-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-5-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-6-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-7-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> <1279517483-22751-8-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20100719084745.GA7002@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:31:23PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. > > This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not > as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in > this version. > > Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC, > and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating clksrc_src > representations of the clocks. Because CPUFREQ reverts the CLK_SRC > to the supposed values, this does not affect the consistency as long as > there are no other modules that modifies clock sources of ARMCLK, G3D, > G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM (and only CPUFREQ should have the control). As > soon as clock framework is settled, we may update source clocks > (.parent field) of those clocks accordingly later. > > > Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park Still: Acked-by: Mark Brown