From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [RFC 02/22] configfs: Add struct configfs_item_operations->check_link() in configfs_unlink() Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:01:01 -0400 Message-ID: <201009071701.02847.konrad@darnok.org> References: <1283160025-6598-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20100902064814.GB27904@mail.oracle.com> <1283456440.5598.108.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1283456440.5598.108.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Joel Becker , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , FUJITA Tomonori , Mike Christie , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Boaz Harrosh , Linux-fsdevel List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > I NAK'd this a while back. I'm willing to be convinced, but so > > far it remains that way. > > Hi Joel, > > Thanks for bringing this point up again. So a brief refresh on why this > is currently required in the fabric independent configfs handlers in > drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c (patch #19). Well, that is great that you mentioned your requirements. But I don't see a quote of Joel's concerns? Is there an LKML link for it perhaps?