From: gregkh@suse.de (Greg KH)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:28:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation about RS485 serial communications
In-Reply-To: <4CDA630F.4060903@atmel.com>
References: <20100408111310.524f7354@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	<4CBD8EE4.5040808@evidence.eu.com> <i9ka0s$4ua$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<201010191727.53314.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
	<i9kk4o$svc$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4CC418A9.6090602@evidence.eu.com> <4CDA630F.4060903@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <20101110172842.GC12371@suse.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:17:03AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 24/10/2010 13:29, Claudio Scordino :
> 
> [..]
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > 	sorry for the misuse of the term "transceiver", and thank you
> > for your corrections.
> > 
> > Hopefully, this new version of the document is slightly better.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This documentation is floating around for some time now. Claudio has
> enhanced it and it is maybe time to merge it in mainline...
> 
> So, can serial people include it in their tree (Greg?) or should it go
> through another path?

I can take it, if someone resends it with the accumulated acks that I
think it gathered over the review cycle.

thanks,

greg k-h