From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix pgd_lock deadlock Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:15:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20110216201524.GA7839@elte.hu> References: <20110215195450.GO5935@random.random> <20110215225234.GP5935@random.random> <20110215231733.GR5935@random.random> <1297850294.2413.30.camel@twins> <20110216101521.GU5935@random.random> <20110216102801.GA23082@elte.hu> <20110216144947.GA5935@random.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110216144947.GA5935@random.random> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , Larry Woodman , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Rik van Riel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Ok sorry, but whenever I'm asked if I tested my patch with lockdep, I think if it > was tested for other bugs, not to remove debug code overlapping with some lockdep > feature. ah, ok. The thing is, if it was only a single VM_BUG_ON() then it wouldnt be a big deal. Seven seems excessive - especially since we have that very check via lockdep. Thanks for removing them! Ingo