Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:38:46 +0100 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20110314083845.GL9835@...1296...> References: <20110312184423.3fee2f17@...1451...> <20110312215420.31033.qmail@...1287...> <20110312195923.55eaa915@...1451...> <20110312232602.10422.qmail@...1287...> <20110312213345.694340df@...1451...> <20110313014000.27475.qmail@...1287...> <20110313142200.GJ9835@...1296...> <20110313160421.3004.qmail@...1287...> <20110313173833.GK9835@...1296...> <20110313231620.12432.qmail@...1287...> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7kW37LRKoI6fR2de" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110313231620.12432.qmail@...1287...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --7kW37LRKoI6fR2de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > > - or try to understand why this is needed in the first place :-) - I st= ill > > don't understand why not binding to anything + --multihome isn't work= ing >=20 > Third time: Multiple openvpn daemons on different interfaces and same > port. That's one possible use case, but not how I understood Federico. gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --7kW37LRKoI6fR2de Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUBTX3UFakuBuNlUUl1AQJO9wP/Wfx8y5hYi7jldKNLHSp3fniCDRa3cWAY z+Xx2gVrksmU9+Ze+rvH+RfFW87HSN++eeGSbobMGksPQ7ijmFghp2LA+ikptJ23 ilvB7BQiUk790cZnUcYqXfZOI0bftxQVD4AM9YmZ377kcsBgmHCoqWD5bgVxcmLr GpNSRpYett4= =gmCU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7kW37LRKoI6fR2de--