From: thierry.reding@avionic-design.de (Thierry Reding) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:48:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 07/10] pwm: tegra: Add device tree support In-Reply-To: <4F67EE9A.6080101@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1331740593-10807-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <1331740593-10807-8-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <4F67EE9A.6080101@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120320084807.GC20249@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/14/2012 09:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > Add auxdata to instantiate the PWFM controller from a device tree, > > include the corresponding nodes in the dtsi files for Tegra 20 and > > Tegra 30 and add binding documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/tegra-pwm.txt > > Can this please be named nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt so that if we need > different bindings for any future Tegra PWM, we won't have any filename > conflicts? That file already documents the bindings for Tegra 20 and Tegra 30, that's why I chose the move generic name. Could this perhaps be documented within the file instead? Or should I rather add a nvidia,tegra30-pwm.txt with a reference to the nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt? Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: