Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:15:17 +0200 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20120325111517.GI1359@...1296...> References: <1332616557-15727-1-git-send-email-alon.barlev@...277...> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WFYXJKyHTUiGqOmp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] build: rename bool->obool List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alon Bar-Lev Cc: Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --WFYXJKyHTUiGqOmp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > However the flags modifications from [1] should be merged anyway, I > will submit a patch. >=20 > What do you think? >=20 > Thanks, > Alon. >=20 > [1] https://297854.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D214304 I strongly support that. This really is used as a bitfield, and not as a boolean, and should not be labled "bool" (and this is independent from the bool/obool/stdbool discussion). gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --WFYXJKyHTUiGqOmp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUBT27+RakuBuNlUUl1AQJ5owP/anNFb0giNtMTwg2dCSEcb1KcQDrIuyCQ yc+8xwn4A3STd4OwAskoXUCaiV5oLHA8ATR2HLSjVw0NgsthQoMRTT4w5OQR7C8N Ny/EdBX282D07FZaqfQm7qEWHJpIdoo7cqVvUYV/XV5ub4+6wiwKGcARNA5cQ6LN 1IQj+8EE3Gw= =I3tO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WFYXJKyHTUiGqOmp--