From: Stefan Richter Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:47:14 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review In-Reply-To: References: <20120411231102.GA6404@kroah.com> <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413154216.476a02ac@stein> <20120414094137.54a7f213@stein> <20120414195559.3d5ab944@stein> <20120414232124.1ffd7ac9@stein> Message-ID: <20120415004714.4d729bef@stein> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Apr 15 Felipe Contreras wrote: > The question that has not been answered is what makes them different, It was answered in the grandparent post and in posts before it. > I'm glad you see it's silly to put bad patches in the stable release > just so they get properly tracked for mainline, but that's exactly > what you arguing for. I am not arguing for anything remotely like that. -- Stefan Richter -=====-===-- -=-- -==== http://arcgraph.de/sr/