Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:24:10 +0200 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20120426172410.GT1359@...1296...> References: <1335441085-18186-1-git-send-email-davids@...1347...> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JR9NRh6vPwO5rijN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Presume that Linux is always IPv6 capable at build time List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alon Bar-Lev Cc: David Sommerseth , openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --JR9NRh6vPwO5rijN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:03:40PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > I plan to add --enable-ipv6/--disable-ipv6 to explicit support ipv6. NAK. We considered this, and this will add a shitload of #ifdefs which will make maintenance of the code a lot harder. (We actually *removed* all the #ifdefs of JJO's IPv6 transport code, because it really hurt) We're in the year 2012, there are no operating systems without IPv6 support anymore, and it does not make sense to have a VPN implementation that has no IPv6 support. gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --JR9NRh6vPwO5rijN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUBT5mEuqkuBuNlUUl1AQIIfwP/S0OLcCjpqM0B08NwDYrPvyJqN8BSoizE AI8vnEIfhA/P4NN0ElqYaMUUF8NSvng5r6Fux9YWslQk94BzvfFmFRx1jKra3Ae0 afYmw5jo4nudtHuNKoJ7S9RRNaMEf6kuOhMtotzzCsna91SxPdFiUCidyFT0tKcr bDTtelDWOTs= =dgJY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JR9NRh6vPwO5rijN--