From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: use FPGA_DBG for the
 "unclaimed register" checks
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:03:09 -0800
Message-ID: <20130125170309.07165dd6@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1359147462-3902-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<1359147462-3902-3-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com
	[209.20.75.48])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFCAE5FB7
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:01:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1359147462-3902-3-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:57:37 -0200
Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> We plan to treat GEN7_ERR_INT as an interrupt, so use this register
> for the checks inside I915_WRITE. This way we can have the best of
> both worlds: the error message with a register address and the
> interrupt.
> 
> V2: Split in 2 patches: one for the macro, one for changing the
> register, as requested by Ben.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Assuming we can come to a consensus on patch 1, it's
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center