From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <201305241530.20845.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20130524130032.GA10167@redhat.com> <20130524131104.GA11462@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , David Howells , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, Hirokazu Takata , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek , linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Koichi Yasutake , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130524131104.GA11462@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 May 2013, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > So this won't work, unless we add the is_kernel_addr check > to might_fault. That will become possible on top of this patchset > but let's consider this carefully, and make this a separate > patchset, OK? Yes, makes sense. Arnd