From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:13:18 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] serial: sh-sci: HSCIF support In-Reply-To: <1371461329-26467-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> References: <1371461329-26467-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1371461329-26467-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20130617101318.GA28277@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [ Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman ] On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 06:28:47PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > From: Ulrich Hecht > > Adds support for "High Speed Serial Communications Interface with FIFO", > essentially a SCIF with 128-byte FIFOs and more accurate baud rate > generator. > > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht > Acked-by: Paul Mundt > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman [ snip ] > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h > index 74c2bf7..26eee07 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h > @@ -226,4 +226,7 @@ > /* Rocketport EXPRESS/INFINITY */ > #define PORT_RP2 102 > > +/* SH-SCI */ > +#define PORT_HSCIF 103 > + > #endif /* _UAPILINUX_SERIAL_CORE_H */ It seems that 103 conflicts with #define PORT_LPUART 103 which is present in commit c9e2e946fb0b ("tty: serial: add Freescale lpuart driver support") which is in turn present in linux-next via tty-next. Should I re-spin this patch using 104 for PORT_HSCIF ?