Return-Path: Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:55:26 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 0/8] 3.0.85-stable review Message-ID: <20130702185526.GC7857@kroah.com> References: <20130701200232.909858308@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:46:10PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 07/01/2013 03:08 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.85 release. > > There are 8 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Jul 3 19:59:07 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.85-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.84, 3.4.51, and 3.9.8 > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5: > (3.4.52-rc1, and 3.9.9-rc1) > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics: > (3.0.85-rc1, 3.4.52-rc1, and 3.9.9-rc1) > > dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the > previous dmesgs for each of these releases. Thanks for testing and letting us know. greg k-h