From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:52:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: samsung: move common plls registration into separate function In-Reply-To: <1874409.iWz7oWBuYA@thinkpad> References: <201307100057.06061.heiko@sntech.de> <1874409.iWz7oWBuYA@thinkpad> Message-ID: <201307111052.13618.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, 09:46:53 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 10 of July 2013 22:29:13 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > > Hi Heiko, > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > > > All Samsung PLLs use similar code to register the clocks and clkdev > > > lookups. Therefore move these into a separate function to reduce code > > > duplication. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Russell King > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > > --- > > > > I have posted patch for adding common pll registration function > > which some how missed to get merged. I hope will get merged after rc1. > > Please give a look at that : > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg19543.ht > > ml > > Yeah, I was going to post a link to it, but I couldn't find it on any > mailing list archive. I think we should go with the way of registration > introduced by Yadwinder. the linked patch looks nice, thanks for the link. So I'll redo the plls against it in the next round. Heiko