From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:44:11 +0100 Subject: [RESEND Patch 2/2] DT: bindings: add missing Marvell Kirkwood SoC documentation In-Reply-To: <20140306122300.GW1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1394054474-4310-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1394054474-4310-3-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20140306122300.GW1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20140306124411.GH4780@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:23:00AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:14PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Marvell Dove SoC binding was not documented, yet. Add the > > s/Dove/Kirkwood/ Doh. I cut/paste from the Dove file. > > documentation including the supported SoCs and boards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,kirkwood.txt | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,kirkwood.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,kirkwood.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,kirkwood.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..925ecbf6e7b7 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,kirkwood.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ > > +Marvell Kirkwood SoC Family Device Tree Bindings > > +------------------------------------------------ > > + > > +Boards with a SoC of the Marvell Kirkwook family, eg 88f6281 > > s/Kirkwook/Kirkwood/ I really need to add Kirkwood to my dictionary. > > + > > +* Required root node properties: > > +compatible: must contain "marvell,kirkwood" > > + > > +In addition, the above compatible shall be extended with the specific > > +SoC. Currently known SoC compatibles are: > > + > > +"marvell,kirkwood-88f6192" > > +"marvell,kirkwood-88f6281" > > +"marvell,kirkwood-88f6282" > > +"marvell,kirkwood-88f6283" > > +"marvell,kirkwood-88f6702" > > +"marvell,kirkwood-98DX4122" > > + > > +And in addition, the compatible shall be extended with the specific > > +board. Currently known boards are: > > This is more a question for Grant and the other DT maintainers: Do we > really need this? checkpatch.pl says yes, we need this. It gives warnings for every unknown compatible string. I would say it is up to Grant and the other DT maintainers to decide if checkpatch.pl is wrong. Andrew