From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:03:47 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot] CONFIG_LOADADDR vs CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR
Message-ID: <20140404190347.356D.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi.


I sometimes get confused by similar naming macros.

In my understanding, CONFIG_LOADADDR or CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR
is used as default address by such commands as "bootm", "tftpboot", etc.

If both are defined, it looks like CONFIG_LOADADDR takes precedence
(as far as I tested).

Do we need both?
Is it a good idea to merge them?


Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada