From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:03:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v6 00/12] CCF support for Renesas r7s72100 In-Reply-To: <20140516064938.GA2593@katana> References: <1400029816-24028-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20140514050801.GE3502@verge.net.au> <20140514230241.GA29233@verge.net.au> <20140516001944.GA9418@verge.net.au> <20140516064938.GA2593@katana> Message-ID: <20140516070333.GA9149@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 08:49:38AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I do not feel particularly strongly about this. But it seems to me that it > > > would make sense to take the same approach as koelsch and lager. > > > > Wolfram, are you planing to handle this one way or another? > > I'll check what it takes for the reference removal. Hopefully it is not > too late in the cycle for this? It is my hope that such a change can be treated as a fix and thus it is not too late. I suspect that if you look at the reference removal of koelsch and lager, or the more recent marzen patches, that you should be able to see a pattern that works for genmai too.