From: mpa@pengutronix.de (Markus Pargmann) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:50:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] net: cpsw: Add am33xx MACID readout In-Reply-To: References: <1408202315-20006-1-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <1408202315-20006-6-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <53F244DA.3070803@ti.com> <20140818154112.6601cbff@gandalf.local.home> <53F25AD1.8040504@ti.com> Message-ID: <20140819085002.GE12930@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:50:59AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Mugunthan, > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > >> > >> Thus, for this patchset, as is: > >> > >> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt > > > > This will fail for DRA7xx not in AM33xx > > > > cpsw_am33xx_cm_get_macid() checks for > of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am33xx") and returns 0 if the machine is > not an am33xx. cpsw_probe_dt() only propagates the return value if is > not 0 so this patch does not change the semantics for other SoCs > besides am33xx. Yes, this patch is only about the am33xx. I don't have the DRA7xx hardware so I am not able to test on that hardware. Mugunthan, perhaps you can supply some followup patches for DRA7xx. Best regards, Markus -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: