From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/5] Define new syscalls readv2,preadv2,writev2,pwritev2 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 03:52:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20140919105220.GC14281@infradead.org> References: <20140918184823.GA10155@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Milosz Tanski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , Volker Lendecke , Tejun Heo , Jeff Moyer , Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140918184823.GA10155@birch.djwong.org> Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:48:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > A few months ago I was working on extending these interfaces (well, the > p{read,write}* ones and AIO) to tack on an IO extension buffer at the end of > the syscall arguments. Honestly, that proposal is so but ugly that I treated it as an April first joke. I don't really think we want any of that overload mess. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org