From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:12:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: at91/dt: sam9x5: Add CAN device nodes In-Reply-To: <1412248785-28269-1-git-send-email-alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> References: <20141002105716.GG3907@piout.net> <1412248785-28269-1-git-send-email-alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Message-ID: <20141006141203.GB15599@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 02/10/2014 at 13:19:45 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote : > Add the missing CAN devices node including their pin muxing and clocks. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein > --- > Changes in v2: > * Adjusted pinmux comment > > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > index e1a5c70..e3f11f2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > @@ -763,6 +795,22 @@ > }; > }; > > + can0 { > + pinctrl_can0_rx_tx: can0_rx_tx { > + atmel,pins = > + + AT91_PIOA 10 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* CANTX, conflicts with DTXD */ Last nitpick, could you make that be CANRX0 and CANTX0 ? > + }; > + }; > + > + can1 { > + pinctrl_can1_rx_tx: can1_rx_tx { > + atmel,pins = > + + AT91_PIOA 5 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* CANTX, conflicts with TXD1 */ And CANRX1, CANTX1 here so that it is the same as the datasheet. Then you can add my acked-by. Thanks ! > + }; > + }; > + > pioA: gpio at fffff400 { > compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio", "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio"; > reg = <0xfffff400 0x200>; > -- > 2.0.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com