From: Guenter Roeck Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:37:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] hwmon: (ibmpowernv) Use platform 'id_table' to probe the device Message-Id: <20141111183752.GA23539@roeck-us.net> List-Id: References: <20141105110848.6183.55611.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20141105142149.GA23212@roeck-us.net> <1415574297.29291.3.camel@concordia> In-Reply-To: <1415574297.29291.3.camel@concordia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Neelesh Gupta , jdelvare@suse.de, benh@au1.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michaele@au1.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:04:57AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 06:21 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:45:14PM +0530, Neelesh Gupta wrote: > > > The current driver probe() function assumes the sensor device to be > > > alwary present and gets executed every time if the driver is loaded, > > > but the appropriate hardware could not be present. > > > > > > So, move the platform device creation as part of platform init code > > > and use the 'id_table' to check if the device present or not. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neelesh Gupta > > > > Looks good. We'll need an ack from one of the powerpc maintainers to proceed. > > Looks OK to me. > > Acked-by: Michael Ellerman > Applied to -next. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors