Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:10:58 +0100 From: Gert Doering Message-ID: <20141127151058.GC17158@...1296...> References: <1416755831-21250-1-git-send-email-lstipakov@...277...> <20141127142228.GA17158@...1296...> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DRfr/2Y1Zz/5r+Kb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Peer-id patch v7 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lev Stipakov Cc: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" --DRfr/2Y1Zz/5r+Kb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:08:09PM +0200, Lev Stipakov wrote: > As for the second question - hard to say. If we make it opt-in, we > probably will need to announce this feature loudly to make users aware > of that. From the other side, it is not inconceivable to assume that > someone might not want this. Maybe we could make it opt-out and have > "-no-peer-id" config option? Definitely not "a new option", as we already have --float :-) But I can see the argument about opt-in/opt-out - I found it a useful thing to explicitely enable the feature (so, no surprises here) but if there is not enough advertising, people won't be able to benefit=20 from it... gert --=20 USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~ge= rt/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@...1296... fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@...1297... --DRfr/2Y1Zz/5r+Kb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQCVAwUBVHc/AqkuBuNlUUl1AQJdkwP/bzz/BIaaoOHY10PKRzHntijWhh1b18M8 A1Hx9/gxDB1AOHCxkDPXVNMkjawDSLIdjs+ssCPluQ1xNFVLtTlf2itBn0TBvvzp ZLecoLIgmDdcBxokwWCnmuYxp5TYVFHCuKQZoL1ob9yUj3N+iWwZQSTA7YIpnBqF NSV7E1Pf9wE= =E8qC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DRfr/2Y1Zz/5r+Kb--