From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:46:11 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 13/16] ARM: shmobile: remove use of gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake In-Reply-To: <5480220B.1020909@arm.com> References: <1417539497-20101-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1417539497-20101-14-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20141204063909.GF19568@verge.net.au> <5480220B.1020909@arm.com> Message-ID: <20141204114610.GC19465@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 08:57:47AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 04/12/14 06:39, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:58:14PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> shmobile only uses gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake to prevent the GIC > >> from returning -ENXIO when receiving a wake-up configuration request. > >> > >> It is a lot simpler to tell the irq layer that we don't need any > >> configuration by using the IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE, thanks to the > >> new gic_set_irqchip_flags function. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > this looks reasonable to me. Should I take it through my tree > > (in v3.20) or did you have another path in mind? > > As you can see, there is a dependency on the GIC itself, and other > platforms are affected to. So I'd think that an arm-soc branch > containing all the required patches would be more appropriate, assuming > that you're happy to Ack this patch. Sure, that is fine by me. Acked-by: Simon Horman