From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:14:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree
 under GPLv2+/X11
In-Reply-To: <20141222112933.GK19261@kw.sim.vm.gnt>
References: <20141218191528.GY967@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <549437DD.7040602@free-electrons.com>
 <20141219160230.GZ967@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <54944DAC.1000709@free-electrons.com>
 <20141219170328.GA967@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <54945C5C.2080801@free-electrons.com>
 <20141219174300.GB967@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20141219181616.GG19261@kw.sim.vm.gnt>
 <20141221235000.GC28117@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20141222112933.GK19261@kw.sim.vm.gnt>
Message-ID: <20141222191435.GI32716@lunn.ch>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> > In the long term, we're attempting to provide one neutral place [1] for
> > the bootloaders and kernels to pull devicetrees from and contribute
> > changes back to.
> 
> OK, let's see if I understand correctly.
> 
> If I don't agree with the GPLv2+/x11 relicensing, then support for
> almost all the LaCie boards will be removed from the Linux kernel (maybe
> during the next merge window) ? Is that correct ?

I would NAK such a removal. 

	   Andrew