From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] xl: enable using ranges of pCPUs when manipulating cpupools Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:21:39 +0000 Message-ID: <20150313152139.GC19822@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20150313110535.32539.77102.stgit@Solace.station> <20150313110932.32539.25885.stgit@Solace.station> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150313110932.32539.25885.stgit@Solace.station> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Juergen Gross , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:09:32PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > in fact, right now, xl sub-commands 'cpupool-cpu-add' and > 'cpupool-cpu-remove' only accept the specification of one > pCPU to be added or removed to/from a cpupool. > > With this change, they can deal with ranges, like "4-8", > or "node:1,12-18,^14". The syntax is exactly the same one > that is supported by the 'vcpu-pin' subcommand, and > specifying just one pCPU still works, of course. > > This make things more flexible, more consistent, and also > improves error handling, as the pCPU range parsing routine > already present in xl is more reliable than just a call > to atoi(). > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli > Cc: Ian Campbell > Cc: Ian Jackson > Cc: Stefano Stabellini > Cc: Wei Liu > Cc: Juergen Gross Acked-by: Wei Liu